If a lawyer's client cannot afford to pay for an expert, what can the lawyer consider?

In family law cases, when a client is unable to afford an expert, one potential avenue is applying for an interim distribution of assets. This option may involve seeking a court order for an early distribution of marital assets to cover necessary expenses, such as expert fees. By demonstrating the need for expert testimony and the client's financial constraints, the lawyer can present a case to the court, arguing that this distribution is essential for the client's fair representation and to ensure that justice is served in the proceedings.

This approach acknowledges the importance of expert evidence in various aspects of family law, such as child custody assessments or property valuations. By seeking interim distributions, the lawyer is taking proactive steps to ensure that the client has access to the necessary resources to adequately present their case.

While other options, like finding a pro bono expert, may be considered, there could be challenges in actually securing such services depending on the availability of experts willing to work without compensation. Ignoring the expert requirement is clearly not a viable option, as the ramifications could severely impact the outcome of the case.

In essence, applying for an interim distribution of assets balances the need for expert input with the financial reality faced by the client, ensuring that proper legal representation can be achieved.