True or False: The court may make an order regarding property or debt subject to a property/debt agreement.

The statement is true because a court does indeed retain the authority to make orders regarding the division of property and debt even when there is an existing property or debt agreement between parties in family law matters. While such agreements can influence or provide a framework for how assets and liabilities are divided, they are not necessarily binding on the court; the judge can intervene if deemed necessary, especially in cases where the agreement may not be fair or if circumstances have changed significantly since the agreement was made.

In specific situations, such as if the agreement is found to be unconscionable or if it fails to provide for the needs of a dependent spouse or children, the court can set aside the agreement or modify its terms, emphasizing the court's overarching responsibility to ensure just outcomes. This understanding is crucial in navigating family law as agreements are often negotiated to avoid litigation, but courts have the final say in enforcing or modifying such agreements in light of the changing circumstances or fairness considerations.

Other options presented imply limitations on the court's ability to intervene, which do not accurately reflect the court's discretionary power in family law. For instance, suggesting that court intervention is only permissible in cases of fraud or contingent upon mutual agreements between parties does not encompass the full scope of the court's authority