What is the recommended action if a lawyer believes that a client is persisting in unreasonable instructions?

When a lawyer believes that a client is persisting in unreasonable instructions, the recommended approach is to try to persuade the client to consider more reasonable alternatives and then withdraw if necessary. This option emphasizes the importance of communication and collaboration between the lawyer and the client, aiming for a mutual understanding of the situation.

Engaging with the client allows the lawyer to clarify the potential consequences of unreasonable instructions, which may include unreasonable costs, negative legal outcomes, or ethical implications. By discussing these issues, the lawyer can help the client gain a clearer perspective, which could lead to more rational decision-making.

If, after this dialogue, the client still insists on pursuing unreasonable instructions, the lawyer may have an ethical duty to withdraw from the case. This withdrawal would need to be conducted in a manner that minimizes harm to the client and complies with ethical guidelines. Therefore, this option reflects a balance between professional responsibility and the duty to the client, ensuring that the lawyer acts in the best interest of both their practice and their client.